C. S. Lewis on Myth

C. S. Lewis on Myth


from a letter of September 5, 1931


About his recent viewing of Shakespeare's The Winter's Tale: "[the play] is merely the scaffolding whereby Shakespeare (probably unconsciously) is able to give us an image of the whole idea of resurrection, [and] I was simply overwhelmed. You will say that I am here doing to Shakespeare just what I did to Macdonald . . . Perhaps I am. I must confess that more and more the value of plays and novels becomes for me dependent on the moments when, by whatever artifice, they succeed in expressing the great myths."


from a letter of October 18, 1931

Now what Dyson and Tolkien showed me was this: that if I met the idea of sacrifice in a Pagan story I didn't mind it at all: again, that if I met the idea of a god sacrificing himself to himself . . . I like it very much and was mysteriously moved by it: again, that the idea of the dying and reviving god (Balder, Adonis, Bacchus) similarly moved me provided I met it anywhere except in the Gospels. The reason was that in Pagan stories I was prepared to feel the myth as profound and suggestive of meanings beyond my grasp even tho' I could not say in cold prose 'what it meant'.

Now the story of Christ is simply a true myth: a myth working on us in the same way as the others, but with this tremendous difference that it really happened: and one must be content to accept it in the same way, remembering that it is God's myth where the others are men's myth: i.e. the Pagan stories are God expressing Himself through the minds of poets, using such images as He found there, while Christianity is God expressing Himself through what we call 'real things'. Therefore it is true, not in the sense of being a 'description' of God (that no finite mind could take in) but in the sense of being the way in which God chooses to (or can) appear to our faculties. The 'doctrines' we get out of the true myths are of course less true: they are translations into our concepts and ideas of the wh. God has already expressed in a language more adequate, namely the actual incarnation, crucifixion, and resurrection. Does this amount to a belief in Christianity? At any rate I am now certain (a) That this Christian story is to be approached, in a sense, as I approach the other myths. (b) That it is the most important and full of meaning. I am also nearly certain that it really happened.


from The Pilgrim's Regress (1933)

See Book 8, Chapter 8


from the essay "Myth Became Fact" (1944)

The heart of Christianity is a myth which is also a fact. The old myth of the Dying God, without ceasing to be myth, comes down from the heaven of legend and imagination to the earth of history. It happens--at a particular date, in a particular place, followed by definable historical consequences. We pass from a Balder or an Osiris, dying nobody knows when or where, to a historical Person crucified (it is all in order) under Pontius Pilate. By becoming fact it does not cease to be myth: that is the miracle. I suspect that men have sometimes derived more spiritual sustenance from myths they did not believe than from the religion they professed. To be truly Christian we must both assent to the historical fact and also receive the myth (fact though it has become) with the same imaginative embrace which we accord to all myth. The one is hardly more necessary than the other.


from the "Preface" to George Macdonald: An Anthology (1946)

[Myth] may even be one of the greatest arts; for it produces works which give . . . as much delight . . . as much wisdom and strength as the works of the greatest poets. . . . It goes beyond the expression of things we have already felt. It arouses in us sensations we have never had before, never anticipated having, as though we had broken out of our normal mode of consciousness and 'possessed joys not promised to our birth!' It gets under our skin, hits us at a level deeper than our thoughts or even our passions, troubles oldest certainties till all questions are reopened, and in general shocks us more fully awake than we are for most of our lives.


from Miracles (1947)

From a footnote to Chapter 15: "My present view--which is tentative and liable to any amount of correction--would be that just as, on the factual side, a long preparation culminates in God's becoming incarnate as Man so, on the documentary side, the truth first appears in mythical form and then by a long process of condensing or focusing finally becomes incarnate as History. This involves the belief that Myth in general is not merely misunderstood history . . . nor diabolical illusion . . . nor priestly lying . . . but, at its best, a real though unfocused gleam of divine truth falling on human imagination. The Hebrews, like other people, had mythology: but as they were the chosen people so their mythology was the chosen mythology--the mythology chosen by God to be the vehicle of the earliest sacred truths, the first step in that process which ends in the New Testament where truth has become completely historical. . . . It should be noted that on this view (a) Just as God, in becoming Man, is 'emptied' of His glory, so the truth, when it comes down from the 'heaven' of myth to the 'earth' of history, undergoes a certain humiliation. Hence the New Testament is, and ought to be, more prosaic, in some ways less splendid, than the Old; just as the Old Testament is and ought to be less rich in many kinds of imaginative beauty than the Pagan mythologies. (b) Just as God is none the less God by being Man, so the Myth remains Myth even when it becomes Fact. The story of Christ demands from us, and repays, not only a religious and historical but also an imaginative response. It is directed to the child, the poet, and the savage in us as well as to the conscience and to the intellect. One of its functions is break down dividing walls.


from "On Three Ways of Writing for Children" (1952)

[When a little boy reads of an enchanted wood] it stirs and troubles him. . . with the dim sense of something beyond his reach and, far from dulling or emptying the actual world, gives it a new dimension of depth. He does not despise real woods because he has read of enchanted woods: the reading makes all real woods a little enchanted.



from a letter of September 22, 1956

. . . a good myth (i.e. a story out of which ever varying meanings will grow for different readers and in different ages) is a higher thing than an allegory (into which one meaning has been put). Into an allegory a man can put only what he already knows; in a myth he puts what he does not yet know and cd. not come by in any other way.


from An Experiment in Criticism (1961)

1. Myths "always have a very simple narrative shape."


2. Myths are "extra-literary."


3. "The pleasure of myth depends hardly at all on . . . suspense or surprise. Even at a first reading it is felt to be inevitable."


4. We do not project ourselves into the characters of a myth.


5. Myth is always "fantastic."


6. The experience of myth may be "sad or joyful but it is always grave. . . . [and] awe-inspiring. . . numinous. It is as if something of great moment had been communicated to us."

Quotes from: http://www.montreat.edu/dking/lewis/MYTH.htm

Mythology and Christ

Mythology and Christ.

Several years ago I read an article written by C.S. Lews, "Myth Became Fact." Lewi's article struck a chord, a melody, in my heart that I have not been able silence. It has set me on a path of discovery, self-discovery, and spiritual growth, which to modern conservative Christian appearance might seem at first glance to far afield from historic Christian roots; but is one, that I believe may actually be closer, upon more careful examination, to the mystical and contemplative Christian roots of the early Church.

Specifically, I've been drawn to reading and study of mythology, dream analysis and symbolism, the writings of Carl Jung, Joseph Campbell, Morton T. Kelsey, John A. Sanford,(the latter two were Christian Priests who were also licensed Clinical Jungian Analysts), etc.

The path or chord struck is a meditation on mythology, dreams, and transcendence, albeit in Christ, which sheds light on the shadow side of our Self. Lewis said,

"Now as myth transcends thought, Incarnation transcends myth. The heart of Christianity is a myth which is also a fact. The old myth of the Dying God, without ceasing to be myth, comes down from the heaven of legend and imagination to the earth of history. It happens- at a particular date, in a particualr place, followed by definable historical consequences. We pass from a Balder or an Osiris, dying nobody knows when or where, to a historical Person crucified (it is all in order) under Pontius Pilate. By becoming fact it does not cease to be myth; that is the miracle. I suspect that men have sometimes derived more spiritual sustenance from myths they did not believe than from the religion they professed...

A man who disbelieved the Christian story as fact but continually fed on it as myth would, perhaps, be more spiritully alive than the one who assented and did not think much about it."

Most of us assume that Myth refers to something which is not true or real; whereas, Myth deals with reality on a much higher or intuitive plain than so much of our theoligical diatribe and formulations. Myth is the Canon of Archetypal Symbols and Images of Man's Psychic (Gr: Psyche= soul) Content shared through the power of Story, Enactment, and Ritual. The fact that we Moderns and Modern Christians have lost through our scholastic, academic and theological De-Mythologizing the power of story, enactment, symbols, imagery, and ritual, is symptomatic of the fat that we have largely lost our soul.

The story of J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy (whether read or watched) or Mel Gibson's rendition of the Passion of Christ strikes a chord in the heart, the psychic depths, which allows for participation and association with the myth through identification with the characters or a katharis experience, that a mere reading of St. Paul's theological diatribe does not. Why? Because we have been cut off from the mythical, cultic (refers to worship practices), ritualistic, sacramental, and Eucharistic practises of Early Christian mysticism, of which Paul particpated.

-More Later....